Validity and Reliability of the Hockey Playing Tactics Assessment Instrument
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37742/jmpo.v6i2.175Keywords:
Assessment, Hockey, Reliability, Student, ValidityAbstract
This research aims to develop and test the validity and reliability of an assessment instrument for hockey playing tactics in the context of student sports coaching. The research uses an instrument development design with a quantitative evaluative approach. The research subjects are members of the Hockey Student Activity Unit (UKM Hoki) at STKIP Pasundan, who are involved in modified games (small-sided games). Content validity is tested through expert judgment using Aiken’s V index, while construct validity is analyzed through item-total correlation. Instrument reliability is tested using Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) and Cronbach’s Alpha. The research results show that all instrument indicators have good content validity and construct validity, as well as high inter-rater reliability and internal consistency. Thus, the developed instrument is declared valid and reliable for assessing students' hockey playing tactic abilities, and is suitable for use in the context of sports coaching and learning in higher education.
References
AERA, APA, & NCME. (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. American Educational Research Association.
Boateng, G. O., Neilands, T. B., Frongillo, E. A., Melgar-Quiñonez, H. R., & Young, S. L. (2018). Best practices for developing and validating scales for health, social, and behavioral research: A primer. Frontiers in Public Health, 6, 149. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00149
Bulley, C., Donaghy, M., Payne, A., & Mutrie, N. (2017). A critical review of the validity of measuring stages of change in relation to exercise and moderate physical activity. Critical Public Health, 17(1), 17–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/09581590601045261
Hambali, S., & Hardi, V. J. (2024). Assessment Of Athlete Concentration Via Application: Validity, Reliability And Categorization. Halaman Olahraga Nusantara: Jurnal Ilmu Keolahragaan, 7(2), 509-518. https://doi.org/10.31851/hon.v7i2.15668
Harvey, S., Pill, S., & Almond, L. (2018). Old wine in new bottles: a response to claims that teaching games for understanding was not developed as a theoretically based pedagogical framework. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 23(2), 166–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2017.1359526
Hay, P. (2019). Assessment for learning in physical education. In D. Kirk, D. Macdonald, M. O'Sullivan (Eds.) Assessment for learning in physical education (pp. 312-325). SAGE Publications Ltd, https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848608009.n18
Kane, M. T. (2021). Validating the interpretations and uses of test scores. Journal of Educational Measurement, 58(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/jedm.12265
Kirk, D. (2010). Physical education futures. Routledge.
López-Pastor, V. M., Kirk, D., Lorente-Catalán, E., MacPhail, A., & Macdonald, D. (2013). Alternative assessment in physical education: a review of international literature. Sport, Education and Society, 18(1), 57–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2012.713860
Manso-Lorenzo, V., Evangelio, C., Ruiz-Tendero, G., & González-Víllora, S. (2024). Game performance assessment instrument in physical education: a systematic review from 2015 to 2024. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2024.2432313
Memmert, D., & Harvey, S. (2008). The Game Performance Assessment Instrument (GPAI): Some Concerns and Solutions for Further Development. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 27(2), 220-240. Retrieved Dec 22, 2025, from https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.27.2.220
Miller, A., Christensen, E., Eather, N., Gray, S., Sproule, J., Keay, J., & Lubans, D. (2015). Can physical education and physical activity outcomes be developed simultaneously using a game-centered approach? European Physical Education Review, 22(1), 113-133. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336X15594548 (Original work published 2016)
Morgado, F.F.R., Meireles, J.F.F., Neves, C.M. et al. Scale development: ten main limitations and recommendations to improve future research practices. Psicol. Refl. Crít. 30, 3 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41155-016-0057-1
Ní Chróinín, D., Fletcher, T., & O’Sullivan, M. (2018). Pedagogical principles of learning to teach meaningful physical education. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 23(2), 117–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2017.1342789
O’Connor, D., Larkin, P., & Williams, A. M. (2017). What learning environments help improve decision-making? Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 22(6), 647–660. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2017.1294678
Rudd, J. R., Woods, C., Correia, V., Seifert, L., & Davids, K. (2021). An ecological dynamics conceptualisation of physical ‘education’: Where we have been and where we could go next. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 26(3), 293–306. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2021.1886271
Wang J, Soon CC, Samsudin S, Wang C, Gao Z, et al. (2024) Tactical games model in physical education: A systematic review. PLOS ONE 19(11): e0311321. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0311321
Yin H, Omar Dev RD, Soh KG, Li F, Lian M (2024) Assessment and development of physical education teachers’ physical literacy: A systematic review. PLOS ONE 19(7): e0307505. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0307505
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Jurnal Master Penjas & Olahraga
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
